<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AAS Public Policy Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aas.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aas.org</link>
	<description>The Steady State of the Union</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Science Spending as a fraction of GDP by Marshall Perrin</title>
		<link>http://blog.aas.org/2008/06/30/science-spending/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Perrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aas.org/?p=35#comment-454</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It seems like the big drop happened in 1992-1995. That's around the time the SSC was cancelled, so I suspect that plays some role in the drop, but were there other factors involved then?  Funding as a percent of GDP has been pretty constant ever since, so the picture is perhaps not quite as grim as all that. One big drop in the past is bad, but it's far less bad than a constant and slow erosion would be.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like the big drop happened in 1992-1995. That&#8217;s around the time the SSC was cancelled, so I suspect that plays some role in the drop, but were there other factors involved then?  Funding as a percent of GDP has been pretty constant ever since, so the picture is perhaps not quite as grim as all that. One big drop in the past is bad, but it&#8217;s far less bad than a constant and slow erosion would be.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Science Spending as a fraction of GDP by Brian T</title>
		<link>http://blog.aas.org/2008/06/30/science-spending/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aas.org/?p=35#comment-452</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The title on this post should be changed from "function" to "fraction"&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title on this post should be changed from &#8220;function&#8221; to &#8220;fraction&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Science Spending as a fraction of GDP by Marcos</title>
		<link>http://blog.aas.org/2008/06/30/science-spending/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aas.org/?p=35#comment-410</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Clicking on the graph should make it larger.  The small image is linked to the full size version.  In the latest versions of IE, Firefox, and Safari the image should zoom out when you click on it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clicking on the graph should make it larger.  The small image is linked to the full size version.  In the latest versions of IE, Firefox, and Safari the image should zoom out when you click on it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Science Spending as a fraction of GDP by Richard Altrock</title>
		<link>http://blog.aas.org/2008/06/30/science-spending/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Altrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aas.org/?p=35#comment-409</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can't read the graph.  It needs to be made available in a larger format.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t read the graph.  It needs to be made available in a larger format.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
